Regressions Slip Through
Without automated coverage, every release risks breaking something that used to work.
Manual testing where judgment matters, automated regression where consistency matters, and release gates that make "it works on my machine" nobody's problem.
Why Teams Bring In Dedicated QA
Without automated coverage, every release risks breaking something that used to work.
Unreliable test suites get ignored - then nobody notices when they catch a real bug.
Without a defined bar for "ready to ship," releases become a judgment call under pressure.
What We Cover
Human judgment on new features, edge cases, and UX flows automation can't evaluate.
Cypress, Selenium, and Jest coverage that runs on every build, not just before a launch.
Defined pass/fail criteria wired into your pipeline, so shipping broken code takes an explicit override.
Read Next
Test pyramid design, tool selection, flakiness reduction, release gates, and how to evaluate a QA partner - see our full Test Automation & QA Strategy Playbook.
Both. We use manual exploratory testing where judgment matters most - new features, edge cases, UX flows - and automation for anything that runs on every release: regression, smoke tests, and release gates.
Yes. We start with a risk-based audit of your highest-traffic and highest-risk flows, build regression coverage there first, then expand outward - rather than trying to test everything on day one.
Cypress and Selenium for web, Jest for unit testing, Postman for API testing, plus platform-native tools for mobile - matched to your stack rather than forced onto it.
Tell us your stack and current coverage. We'll scope a QA plan within days.